|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 39, No. 7,
868-883 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039007008
Drug Abuse Prevention Programming
Do We Know What Content Works?
STEWART I. DONALDSON
Claremont Graduate School
STEVE SUSSMAN
University of Southern California
DAVID P. MacKINNON
Arizona State University
HERBERT H. SEVERSON
University of Oregon at Eugene
THOMAS GLYNN
National Cancer Institute
DAVID M. MURRAY
University of Minnesota
ELAINE J. STONE
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
This article summarizes the theoretical underpinnings, substantive contents, and limitations of comprehensive social-influences-based drug abuse prevention programming. This type of programming has produced the most consistently successful preventive effects. There is some evidence that one major part of these programs, changing social norms, is an essential ingredient for successful drug abuse prevention programming. Research suggests that these effects may not be contingent on the use of refusal assertion training, a prototype activity of social-influences-based prevention programs. Because programs, when disseminated to the public, often contain only a subset of lessons from the social influences curriculum, there remains the potential error of implementing a combination of lessons that may not be effective. Further, there is evidence that other types of prevention programming, such as physical consequences programming, may be successful in some situations. Finally, social-influences-based programming may not be as effective with some subpopulations such as high-risk youths.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Longshore, P. L. Ellickson, D. F. McCaffrey, and P. A. St. Clair
School-Based Drug Prevention Among At-Risk Adolescents: Effects of ALERT Plus
Health Educ Behav,
August 1, 2007;
34(4):
651 - 668.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L Renaud, J O'Loughlin, and V Dery
The St-Louis du Parc Heart Health Project: a critical analysis of the reverse effects on smoking
Tob. Control,
September 1, 2003;
12(3):
302 - 309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Murgraff, M. R. McDermott, and J. Walsh
Exploring attitude and belief correlates of adhering to the new guidelines for low-risk single-occasion drinking: an application of the theory of planned behaviour
Alcohol Alcohol.,
March 1, 2001;
36(2):
135 - 140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Chipungu, J. Hermann, S. Sambrano, M. Nistler, E. Sale, and J. F. Springer
Prevention Programming for African American Youth: A Review of Strategies in CSAP's National Cross-Site Evaluation of High-Risk Youth Programs
Journal of Black Psychology,
November 1, 2000;
26(4):
360 - 385.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Allott, R. Paxton, and R. Leonard
Drug education: a review of British Government policy and evidence on effectiveness
Health Educ. Res.,
August 1, 1999;
14(4):
491 - 505.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Murgraff, M. R. Mcdermott, D. White, and K. Phillips
REGRET IS WHAT YOU GET: THE EFFECTS OF MANIPULATING ANTICIPATED AFFECT AND TIME PERSPECTIVE ON RISKY SINGLE-OCCASION DRINKING
Alcohol Alcohol.,
July 1, 1999;
34(4):
590 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Simons-Morton, L. Donohew, and A. Davis Crump
Health Communication in the Prevention of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 1997;
24(5):
544 - 554.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. DENT, S. SUSSMAN, P. ELLICKSON, P. BROWN, and J. RICHARDSON
Is Current Drug Abuse Prevention Programming Generalizable Across Ethnic Groups?
American Behavioral Scientist,
June 1, 1996;
39(7):
911 - 918.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. JOHNSON, J. W. FARQUHAR, and S. SUSSMAN
Methodological and Substantive Issues in Substance Abuse Prevention Research: An Integration
American Behavioral Scientist,
June 1, 1996;
39(7):
935 - 942.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|