This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by SEIBEL, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Successful Failure

An Alternative View on Organizational Coping

University of Konstanz, Germany

Although organization theory has acknowledged low-performance-high-persistence phenomena, the question remains how resources can conceivably be mobilized in favor of permanently failing organizations. This article argues that permanent organizational failure requires those contributing resources to an organization to be interested in both failure and ignorance about failure. Two illustrative examples—help for battered women, employment of the handicapped—are interpreted as cases where "principals" are not necessarily interested in high performance of their "agents" but rather in symbolic problem solving. It is stated, though, that neither the competitive market nor the public sector in a democratic system is likely to provide a favorable environment for such interest. Rather, there is good sense to assume the third (or nonprofit) sector to provide a structural and ideological setting in which both interest in failure and interest in ignorance about failure may be flourishing.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 39, No. 8, 1011-1024 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039008006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Chambre and N. Fatt Beyond the Liability of Newness: Nonprofit Organizations in an Emerging Policy Domain Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2002; 31(4): 502 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]