American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAZEMORE, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 41, No. 6, 768-813 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764298041006003

Restorative Justice and Earned Redemption

Communities, Victims, and Offender Reintegration

GORDON BAZEMORE

Florida Atlantic University

The author provides a comprehensive discussion of the roots of the new reintegrative and restorative justice theories as well as the success of current, preliminary applications of these theories. Arguing that the traditional and opposing theories of the retributive paradigm and the treatment model offer only a simplistic choice between helping or hurting offenders, the author contends that these systems fail to address adequately the needs of communities and victims. In place of these two paradigms, he suggests a new model that he terms reintegrative or restorative justice. This new theory, based on specific cultural approaches to crime found in New Zealand, Japan, and elsewhere, seeks to address the needs of communities and victims through apology and reparation, a process that hopefully leads to the reintegration of offenders into society.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
G. Robinson and J. Shapland
Reducing Recidivism: A Task for Restorative Justice?
Br. J. Criminol., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 337 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. Stubbs
Beyond apology?: Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 169 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. Lane, S. Turner, T. Fain, and A. Sehgal
Implementing "Corrections of Place" Ideas: The Perspective of Clients and Staff
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2007; 34(1): 76 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
G. Robinson and P. Raynor
The future of rehabilitation: What role for the probation service?
Probation Journal, December 1, 2006; 53(4): 334 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
M. S. Davis
Crimes Mala in Se: An Equity-Based Definition
Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2006; 17(3): 270 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. B. Stinchcomb, G. Bazemore, and N. Riestenberg
Beyond Zero Tolerance: Restoring Justice in Secondary Schools
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2006; 4(2): 123 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
D. S. DeMatteo, D. B. Marlowe, and D. S. Festinger
Secondary Prevention Services for Clients Who Are Low Risk in Drug Court: A Conceptual Model
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2006; 52(1): 114 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. J. Exline, E. L. Worthington Jr., P. Hill, and M. E. McCullough
Forgiveness and Justice: A Research Agenda for Social and Personality Psychology
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2003; 7(4): 337 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
L. S. Urban, J. L. Cyr St., and S. H. Decker
Goal Conflict in the Juvenile Court: The Evolution of Sentencing Practices in the United States
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2003; 19(4): 454 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
G. Bazemore and C. Erbe
Operationalizing the Community Variable in Offender Reintegration:: Theory and Practice for Developing Intervention Social Capital
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2003; 1(3): 246 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
S. Eschholz, M. D. Reed, E. Beck, and P. B. Leonard
Offenders' Family Members' Responses to Capital Crimes: The Need for Restorative Justice Initiatives
Homicide Studies, May 1, 2003; 7(2): 154 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
G. BAZEMORE
Young People, Trouble, and Crime: Restorative Justice as a Normative Theory of Informal Social Control and Social Support
Youth Society, December 1, 2001; 33(2): 199 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
D. R. KARP and B. BRESLIN
Restorative Justice in School Communities
Youth Society, December 1, 2001; 33(2): 249 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
R. AGNEW
Building on the Foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the Types of Strain Most Likely to Lead to Crime and Delinquency
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2001; 38(4): 319 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
L. LEETS
Explaining Perceptions of Racist Speech
Communication Research, October 1, 2001; 28(5): 676 - 706.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
E. C. Lemley
Designing Restorative Justice Policy: An Analytical Perspective
Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2001; 12(1): 43 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]