American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 41, No. 7, 898-912 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764298041007004

Unintended Consequences

The Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy

HUGH DAVIS GRAHAM

Vanderbilt University

In the 1990s, political opposition in the United States rose against two government policies not previously linked in policy rationale or public debate: affirmative action preferences and large-scale immigration. Historically, reform movements in civil rights and immigration policy had differed significantly in their coalition base, reformist goals, rationales for government intervention, patterns of agency implementation, and communities of policy expertise. Yet both reform drives, sharing common foundations in liberal nondiscrimination theory and constitutional tradition, won major legislative victories in the 1960s. These laws produced unintended consequences: hard affirmative action programs involving minority preferences and mass immigration from developing nations. Immigrants were participating increasingly as minorities eligible for affirmative action remedies originally developed to compensate African Americans for past discrimination under slavery and segregation. These consequences help to explain the rise of intraminority tensions and White native opposition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. D. SKRENTNY
Introduction: Affirmative Action: Some Advice for the Pundits
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 1998; 41(7): 877 - 885.



Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
G. R. LA NOUE and J. C. SULLIVAN
Deconstructing the Affirmative Action Categories
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 1998; 41(7): 913 - 926.
[Abstract]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. LEE
Cultural Brokers: Race-Based Hiring in Inner-City Neighborhoods
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 1998; 41(7): 927 - 937.
[Abstract]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
E. KELLY and F. DOBBIN
How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management: Employer Response to Antidiscrimination Law, 1961 to 1996
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 1998; 41(7): 960 - 984.
[Abstract]