|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 42, No. 8,
1368-1392 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921954903
The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates
Economics Versus the Environment
ANDREW J. HOFFMAN
Boston University
MARC J. VENTRESCA
Northwestern University
By framing the economics versus environment debate as a mixed-motive situation, opportunities become visible that allow greater benefits to all interests in the debate. Yet, social, cultural, and institutional arrangements frame how these interests see these opportunities, creating a barrier to mixed-motive analyses. In this article, the authors use an institutional perspective to analyze how the economics versue environment debate emerges from institutions as presently structured. They present an analysis of its present framing based on three aspects of institutionsregulative, normative, and cognitiveand consider the prescriptive implications they expose at the managerial and organizational level of action. The authors conclude with an analysis of possible solutions to overcome them.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perkmann and A. Spicer
How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work
Human Relations,
June 1, 2008;
61(6):
811 - 844.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Etzion
Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review
Journal of Management,
August 1, 2007;
33(4):
637 - 664.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.E. D. Creed, J. A. Langstraat, and M. A. Scully
A Picture of the Frame: Frame Analysis as Technique and as Politics
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2002;
5(1):
34 - 55.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. HOFFMAN, H. C. RILEY, J. G. TROAST Jr., and M. H. BAZERMAN
Cognitive and Institutional Barriers to New Forms of Cooperation on Environmental Protection: Insights from Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans
American Behavioral Scientist,
January 1, 2002;
45(5):
820 - 845.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Hoffman
Linking Organizational and Field-Level Analyses: The Diffusion of Corporate Environmental Practice
Organization Environment,
June 1, 2001;
14(2):
133 - 156.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Dacin, M. J. Ventresca, and B. D. Beal
The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions
Journal of Management,
June 1, 1999;
25(3):
317 - 356.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. BAZERMAN, D. A. MOORE, and J. J. GILLESPIE
The Human Mind as a Barrier to Wiser Environmental Agreements
American Behavioral Scientist,
May 1, 1999;
42(8):
1277 - 1300.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|