Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAMIENIECKI, S.
Right arrow Articles by SILVERS, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Forming Partnerships in Environmental Policy

The Business of Emissions Trading in Clean Air Management

SHELDON KAMIENIECKI

University of Southern California

DAVID SHAFIE

University of Southern California

JULIE SILVERS

University of Southern California

This article analyzes whether the move from direct government regulatory control of air pollution to the adoption of the Los Angeles RECLAIM (Regional Clean Air Incentives Market) emissions trading system, a more private form of air quality management, has indeed resulted in greater effectiveness and efficiency in an equitable and democratic manner as promised. The study begins with a brief description of RECLAIM and federal SO 2 emissions trading programs. The study then analyzes the concepts of effectiveness and efficiency in policy implementation and addresses whether the RECLAIM emissions trading scheme has been, as promised, effective and efficient. This is followed by an investigation of whether the RECLAIM system is equitable and democratic, both of which are concerns of those who are opposed to the adoption of emissions trading. Evidence from the SO 2 emissions trading program is also introduced at certain points in the analysis. The implications of the study's findings are reviewed at the end of the article.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 1, 107-123 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955182


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
D. Jamali
A Public-Private Partnership in the Lebanese Telecommunications Industry: Critical Success Factors and Policy Lessons
Public Works Management Policy, October 1, 2004; 9(2): 103 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
P. V. ROSENAU
Introduction: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 1999; 43(1): 10 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]