Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHNEIDER, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S. Prison System

ANNE LARASON SCHNEIDER

Arizona State University

Prison policy is fundamentally different from virtually all other policy arenas in that prisons deliver punishment, rather than benefits, costs, or regulations. Within a prison, every aspect of an inmate's life is disciplined and subject to enhanced punishment at the discretion of guards and other personnel. Thus, special issues are raised when considering the appropriate role of the private sector in the management or ownership of prisons. Drawing from a theory of policy design, this study traces the emergence, demise, and reemergence of private involvement in prisons. Driven by hopes of creating prisons that could be self-sufficient, or even profitable, public officials periodically have turned to private entrepreneurs to build and manage these institutions. The study examines the claims made for and against private prisons including the "script" that purports to account for their reemergence in the 1990s and the empirical studies that have focused on costs and benefits of various types of public-private partnerships.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 1, 192-208 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955119


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
S. C. Craig
Rehabilitation versus Control: An Organizational Theory of Prison Management
The Prison Journal, December 1, 2004; 84(4_suppl): 92S - 114S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Works Management PolicyHome page
D. Jamali
A Public-Private Partnership in the Lebanese Telecommunications Industry: Critical Success Factors and Policy Lessons
Public Works Management Policy, October 1, 2004; 9(2): 103 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
P. V. ROSENAU
Introduction: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 1999; 43(1): 10 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]