American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALFORD, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 2, 264-277 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955254

Whistle-Blowers

How Much We Can Learn From Them Depends on How Much We Can Give Up

C. FRED ALFORD

University of Maryland

Based on intensive interviews with several dozen whistle-blowers, this article asks what they have to teach about the organizations in which they worked. The most important thing they have to teach is that organizations are deeply threatened by what Kant called ethical autonomy (Mündigkeit). Organizational life is dedicated to the destruction of ethical autonomy for much the same reason that Freud saw social life as dedicated to the suppression of sex and aggression. Ethical autonomy threatens to explode the organization. This may not in fact be the case, but most organizations act as if they believe it. The purpose of sacrificing the whistle-blower is to prevent the outbreak of an epidemic of ethical and moral responsibility that threatens to engulf the organization in a competitive world.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JournalismHome page
Z. Reich
The anatomy of leaks Tracing the path of unauthorized disclosure in the Israeli press
Journalism, October 1, 2008; 9(5): 555 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
H. S. Chan and K. W. Chow
Public Management Policy and Practice in Western China: Metapolicy, Tacit Knowledge, and Implications for Management Innovation Transfer
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 479 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. O'Kelly and M. J. Dubnick
Taking Tough Choices Seriously: Public Administration and Individual Moral Agency
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2006; 16(3): 393 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
D. R. Comer and G. Vega
Unsavory Problems at Tasty's: A Role-Play about Whistle-Blowing
Journal of Management Education, February 1, 2006; 30(1): 251 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]