American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STAR, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 3, 377-391 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955326
© 1999 SAGE Publications

The Ethnography of Infrastructure

SUSAN LEIGH STAR

University of California, San Diego

This article asks methodological questions about studying infrastructure with some of the tools and perspectives of ethnography. Infrastructure is both relational and ecological—it means different things to different groups and it is part of the balance of action, tools, and the built environment, inseparable from them. It also is frequently mundane to the point of boredom, involving things such as plugs, standards, and bureaucratic forms. Some of the difficulties of studying infrastructure are how to scale up from traditional ethnographic sites, how to manage large quantities of data such as those produced by transaction logs, and how to understand the interplay of online and offline behavior. Some of the tricks of the trade involved in meeting these challenges include studying the design of infrastructure, understanding the paradoxes of infrastructure as both transparent and opaque, including invisible work in the ecological analysis, and pinpointing the epistemological status of indictors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
C. Hine
Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 652 - 671.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and P. Wouters
Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 672 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
S. Graham and N. Thrift
Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance
Theory Culture Society, May 1, 2007; 24(3): 1 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
S. D.N. Graham
Software-sorted geographies
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 562 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Bruni
Shadowing Software and Clinical Records: On the Ethnography of Non-Humans and Heterogeneous Contexts
Organization, May 1, 2005; 12(3): 357 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
E. Davenport and I. Bruce
Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2002; 28(3): 225 - 230.
[PDF]