Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Disrupting the Field

Virtual Reality Technologies and "Multisited" Ethnographic Methods

NICOLA GREEN

University of Surrey

This article discusses the challenges involved in constructing a field of study when the social relations in question involve multiple locations, objects, and stories about them. This article argues that the geographical, social, technical, and conceptual uncertainties presented by virtual systems problematize conventional constructions of the field and fieldwork, and require a flexible and "multisited" methodological approach. The article draws on experiences researching virtual reality technologies, and outlines the multisited ethnographic methods used in response to the methodological challenges involved. It outlines strategies of following objects, following people, and following stories to construct a flexible and multiple field of research. Such strategies are consistent with theoretical developments in feminist poststructuralism and science and technology studies that seek to deconstruct the coherence of the research process. The article argues that it is crucial to develop such methodological approaches in order to make nuanced critique of technology development, production, and consumption into the next millennium.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 3, 409-421 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955344


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
J. Burrell
The Field Site as a Network: A Strategy for Locating Ethnographic Research
Field Methods, May 1, 2009; 21(2): 181 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
A. C. Garcia, A. I. Standlee, J. Bechkoff, and Yan Cui
Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, February 1, 2009; 38(1): 52 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
N. Green
How Everyday Life Became Virtual: Mundane work at the juncture of production and consumption
Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2001; 1(1): 73 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]