American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YEATMAN, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 43, No. 9, 1498-1513 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640021956017

Who is the Subject of Human Rights?

ANNA YEATMAN

Macquarie University

What is distinctive about human rights, when compared with the rights claims associated with modern citizenship, animals, or nonbiological units of conscious being (artificial intelligence)? It is suggested that each of these discourses constitutes the subject of rights differently. This article concentrates on both philosophical and psychological means of registering the unique individuality of the subject of human rights. Because human rights is predicated of all human beings, it is a universal discourse and one that Kant called "cosmopolitan right." The subject of human rights is also the subject in its existential integrity or wholeness. This article explores tensions between the subject of human rights and the jurisdictionally limited and exclusive subject of modern citizenship, tensions that pose new demands on states with respect to international law and standards.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
A. Yeatman
Global ethics, Australian citizenship and the 'boat people'- a symposium
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2003; 39(1): 15 - 22.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
A. Yeatman
The new contractualism and individualized personhood
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2002; 38(1): 69 - 73.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
G. Ramia
What is the role of social protection? A response to Yeatman
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2002; 38(1): 74 - 75.
[PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
D. MEREDYTH and J. MINSON
Editors' Introduction: Resourcing Citizenries
American Behavioral Scientist, June 1, 2000; 43(9): 1374 - 1394.
[PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
I. HUNTER and D. MEREDYTH
Popular Sovereignty and Civic Education
American Behavioral Scientist, June 1, 2000; 43(9): 1462 - 1485.
[Abstract] [PDF]