Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KOKU, E.
Right arrow Articles by WELLMAN, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Netting Scholars

Online and Offline

EMMANUEL KOKU

University of Toronto

NANCY NAZER

University of Toronto

BARRY WELLMAN

University of Toronto

Has the Internet affected the ways in which people communicate by lessening the effects of distance? To examine this question, the authors study scholarly and interpersonal relationships—in person and by e-mail—in two scholarly networks, one in a large university and one dispersed across North America. These scholarly networks are harbingers of the turn toward network and virtual organizations. Although the Internet helps scholars to maintain ties over great distances, physical proximity still matters. Those scholars who see each other often or work near each other e-mail each other more often. Frequent contact on the Internet is a complement to frequent face-to-face contact, not a substitute for it. The more scholarly relations network members have, the more frequently they communicate and the more media they use to communicate. Although e-mail helps scholars without strong ties to stay in contact, it is used most by scholars who are collaborators or friends.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 10, 1752-1774 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121958023


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
D. A.R. Ross
Backstage with the Knowledge Boys and Girls: Goffman and Distributed Agency in an Organic Online Community
Organization Studies, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 307 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
E. C. Thompson
Internet-Mediated Networking and Academic Dependency in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United States
Current Sociology, January 1, 2006; 54(1): 41 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
E. Klinenberg and C. Benzecry
Cultural Production in a Digital Age
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2005; 597(1): 6 - 18.
[PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. HAYTHORNTHWAITE
Introduction: The Internet in Everyday Life
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2001; 45(3): 363 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
B. WELLMAN, A. Q. HAASE, J. WITTE, and K. HAMPTON
Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?: Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2001; 45(3): 436 - 455.
[Abstract] [PDF]