American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BYSTROM, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by BANWART, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 12, 1999-2013 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121958456

Framing the Fight

An Analysis of Media Coverage of Female and Male Candidates in Primary Races for Governor and U.S. Senate in 2000

DIANNE G. BYSTROM

Iowa State University

TERRY A. ROBERTSON

Columbia College

MARY CHRISTINE BANWART

University of Oklahoma

The few research studies that explore the media's portrayal of female candidates in comparison to male candidates have been limited to general election campaigns and usually to one level of office. To expand this area of research, this study examines the media's portrayal of female and male candidates in primary races at two levels of political leadership in which the representation of women is strikingly low—state governor and U.S. senator—in the 2000 campaign. This study's exploration of how the media portrays female and male candidates relies on a content analysis of articles from major national newspapers and representative major regional newspapers. By studying the media's portrayal of male and female candidates during primary elections at two levels of political leadership, this study provides an understanding about how men and women are framed differently even when vying for their own party's bid and, thus, new insights into how such primary framing can translate into bias during the general elections.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
L. R. Atkeson and T. B. Krebs
Press Coverage of Mayoral Candidates: The Role of Gender in News Reporting and Campaign Issue Speech
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 61(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
A. W. Barrett and L. W. Barrington
Bias in Newspaper Photograph Selection
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2005; 58(4): 609 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
A. W. Barrett and L. W. Barrington
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?: Newspaper Photographs and Voter Evaluations of Political Candidates
International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2005; 10(4): 98 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. C. Banwart, D. G. Bystrom, and T. Robertson
From the Primary to the General Election: A Comparative Analysis of Candidate Media Coverage in Mixed-Gender 2000 Races for Governor and U.S. Senate
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2003; 46(5): 658 - 676.
[Abstract] [PDF]