|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 12,
2030-2047 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121958474
The Web and U.S. Senatorial Campaigns 2000
SONIA "TITA" PUOPOLO
Dover, Massachusetts
Political communication tools are an inextricable part of the political campaign process. As time and technology advance, the way political information is disseminated and received is altered. This article focuses on the use of the Internet in the U.S. senatorial campaigns of 2000. It looks at how the Web affects the process of political campaigning. The relationship between democracy and the Internet is complex, and the opportunity to make good decisions about the architecture and design of the 21st century digital democratic process is here. It is, therefore, imperative to look at issues and scrutinize how the Internet can be used. Through an in-depth cross-sectional analysis of Web site usage among Democratic and Republican candidates and women and men, the author shows how U.S. senatorial candidates used the Internet in the 2000 campaign. The author's study shows that 88% of the 68 U.S. senatorial candidates had Web sites for the 2000 elections.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Druckman, M. J. Kifer, and M. Parkin
The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations
Social Science Computer Review,
November 1, 2007;
25(4):
425 - 442.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. "Jeff" Gulati and C. B. Williams
Closing the Gap, Raising the Bar: Candidate Web Site Communication in the 2006 Campaigns for Congress
Social Science Computer Review,
November 1, 2007;
25(4):
443 - 465.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Herrnson, A. K. Stokes-Brown, and M. Hindman
Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide: Constituency Characteristics, Strategic Considerations, and Candidate Internet Use in State Legislative Elections
Political Research Quarterly,
March 1, 2007;
60(1):
31 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Williams and K. D. Trammell
Candidate Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential Election 2004
American Behavioral Scientist,
December 1, 2005;
49(4):
560 - 574.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Schweitzer
Election Campaigning Online: German Party Websites in the 2002 National Elections
European Journal of Communication,
September 1, 2005;
20(3):
327 - 351.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Farmer and R. Fender
E-Parties: Democratic and Republican State Parties in 2000
Party Politics,
January 1, 2005;
11(1):
47 - 58.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|