American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TRENT, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by TRENT, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 12, 2101-2124 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121958519

Image, Media Bias, and Voter Characteristics

The Ideal Candidate from 1988-2000

JUDITH S. TRENT

University of Cincinnati

CADY SHORT-THOMPSON

Northern Kentucky University

PAUL A. MONGEAU

Miami University of Ohio

ANDREW K. NUSZ

University of Cincinnati

JIMMIE D. TRENT

Miami University of Ohio

The view of image as a transaction between what candidates say and do and the way in which voters compare that behavior to their beliefs of what candidates should be or do stimulates three critical questions important to political communication. First, although the power of the media to affect the outcome of political campaigns and candidates is believed by citizens and has been documented by researchers, do the views of individual members of the media regarding the ideal qualities required of presidential candidates differ significantly from those of the voters? Second, do the criteria of the "ideal presidential candidate" vary across elections? And finally, do the evaluative dimensions of idealness differ by party affiliation, age, or gender? The answers to these and related questions were determined from a survey of 562 journalists covering, and 1,246 citizens attending, political rallies in New Hampshire during the presidential primaries of 1988, 1992, 1996, and 2000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. L. Edwards and L. Ware
Representing the Public in Campaign Media: A Political Cartoon Perspective
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2005; 49(3): 466 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. S. Trent, C. Short-Thompson, P. A. Mongeau, M. S. Metzler, and J. D. Trent
The Idealized Presidential Candidate: A Vision Over Time
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2005; 49(1): 130 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
K. E. Kendall
Constructing the Primary Story: Embedded With the Media in New Hampshire
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2005; 49(1): 157 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]