American Behavioral Scientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDO, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by KHANNA, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 3, 435-463 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640021956279

Environmental Costs and Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops

Implications for Regulatory Strategies

AMY W. ANDO

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

MADHU KHANNA

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

This article sets forth a framework for evaluating the environmental costs and benefits associated with agricultural genetically modified organisms (GMOs), including impacts on plants, humans, animals, and the environment at large. The authors build on this knowledge to explore how and why GMOs should be regulated, highlighting the need for policy makers to bear in mind that genetically modified seeds might substitute for traditional agricultural practices which themselves have detrimental impacts on the environment. To guide regulation formation, the authors present a review of the literature in environmental economics on optimal and second-best regulation, where the latter is used in the face of real-world complications. They then evaluate how current regulations measure up to those theoretical ideals. Finally, the authors provide some insight into what GMO crop regulation might accomplish by reviewing the evidence on the effects of pesticide regulations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. H. NELSON
Risk Perception, Behavior, and Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Organisms: Toward Understanding American and European Public Reaction
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2001; 44(8): 1371 - 1388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. D. WESTERVELT
Empowering Stakeholders and Policy Makers With Science-Based Simulation Modeling Tools
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2001; 44(8): 1418 - 1437.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. ARENDS-KUENNING and F. MAKUNDI
Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries: Prospects and Policies
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2000; 44(3): 318 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]