Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FENWICK, R.
Right arrow Articles by TAUSIG, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Scheduling Stress

Family and Health Outcomes of Shift Work and Schedule Control

RUDY FENWICK

University of Akron

MARK TAUSIG

University of Akron

The effects of shift work and job schedule control on the family life and health of American workers are analyzed. Using data from the 1992 National Study on the Changing Workforce ( N = 2,905), this article tests whether negative family and health outcomes associated with nonstandard job schedules result from (a) problems of adjusting to the times of nonstandard shifts and/or (b) the lack of scheduling control and (c) whether schedule control mediates the effects of nonstandard shifts. Multivariate results indicate that although nonstandard shifts have few effects, lack of scheduling control has strong negative effects on six of the eight family and health outcomes. There is no evidence that control mediates the effects of schedule times, nor that these effects vary by gender or family status. Implications of these results are discussed.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 7, 1179-1198 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121956719


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
A. Hosking and M. Western
The effects of non-standard employment on work--family conflict
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2008; 44(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
W C Hadden, C Muntaner, J Benach, D Gimeno, and F G Benavides
A glossary for the social epidemiology of work organisation: Part 3, Terms from the sociology of labour markets
J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2007; 61(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Ala-Mursula, J. Vahtera, A. Linna, J. Pentti, and M. Kivimaki
Employee worktime control moderates the effects of job strain and effort-reward imbalance on sickness absence: the 10-town study
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2005; 59(10): 851 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Garland
Improving the ICU: Part 1
Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2151 - 2164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Labor Studies JournalHome page
L. Golden and B. Wiens-Tuers
Mandatory Overtime Work in the United States: Who, Where, and What?
Labor Studies Journal, March 1, 2005; 30(1): 1 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]