Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BULLOCK, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by NITSI, E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Roundup Ready Soybean Technology and Farm Production Costs

Measuring the Incentive to Adopt Genetically Modified Seeds

DAVID S. BULLOCK

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

ELISAVET I. NITSI

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Roundup Ready soybean technology (RR) lowers adopters' costs by (a) allowing postemergence use of the inexpensive herbicide glyphosate, (b) saving on management costs because of simple use, and (c) cutting risk by widening the time window for postemergence spraying. RR lowers nonadopters' costs by (d) creating competition that lowers other herbicides' prices. Our empirical results suggest that for most farms (a) is insufficient to cover the RR seed price premium, so (b) and (c) must be substantial for many adopters. Preliminary results indicate that RR provides bigger cost savings in the western Corn Belt than the eastern. Oligopolistic RR suppliers have set its price premium higher than potential cost/risk savings on many farms. We conclude that RR will not be fully adopted soon.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 44, No. 8, 1283-1301 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121956827


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?