Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOFFMAN, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by BAZERMAN, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cognitive and Institutional Barriers to New Forms of Cooperation on Environmental Protection

Insights from Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans

ANDREW J. HOFFMAN

Boston University

HANNAH C. RILEY

Harvard Business School

JOHN G. TROAST, Jr.

Harvard Business School

MAX H. BAZERMAN

Harvard Business School

Many perceive the predominantly command-and-control structure of regulatory policy to be overly restrictive and inefficient in achieving America's emerging environmental goals. In response, the U.S. government has introduced several voluntary programs to develop innovative, beyond-compliance environmental management solutions through the collaboration between government agencies and regulated entities. Yet, these programs have not gained widespread acceptance. This article analyzes the cognitive and institutional barriers to that acceptance by looking specifically at two programs—Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans. These barriers act out of force of habit, creating a resistance to change and a rejection of new forms of regulatory policy. The authors argue that policy change requires a shift in how individuals think and how institutions guide that thinking.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45, No. 5, 820-845 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202045005006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
D. Etzion
Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review
Journal of Management, August 1, 2007; 33(4): 637 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. VAN VUGT and M. SNYDER
Introduction: Cooperation in Society: Fostering Community Action and Civic Participation
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2002; 45(5): 765 - 768.
[PDF]