This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by FRANKLIN, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Good Intentions

The Enforcement of Hate Crime Penalty-Enhancement Statutes

Forensic Psychologist, El Cerrito, California

This article explores the practical enforcement of laws that increase criminal penalties for bias-related crimes. A review of the literature suggests that penalty-enhancement statutes are meeting some of their goals. At the same time, police implementation is highly variable, prosecutions are rare, and convictions are even rarer. This article summarizes the practical and legal hurdles to enforcement of hate crime laws, including issues regarding enforcement by local police, difficulties in proving motivation, and controversies surrounding deterrence and the larger societal impact of the laws. Because hate crime laws have been operationalized with little or no attention to societal power dynamics and social inequalities, their paradoxical consequences may include disproportionate punishment of minorities whom they were intended to protect. Furthermore, hate crime laws shine their spotlight on relatively powerless individuals at the bottom of the social order and away from the societal institutions that promote or condone discriminatory conduct.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 46, No. 1, 154-172 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202046001010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. D. Phillips The Prosecution of Hate Crimes: The Limitations of the Hate Crime Typology J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 883 - 905. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Saucier, J. M. Hockett, and A. S. Wallenberg The Impact of Racial Slurs and Racism on the Perceptions and Punishment of Violent Crime J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 685 - 701. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Bunar Hate Crimes Against Immigrants in Sweden and Community Responses American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2007; 51(2): 166 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Saucier, T. L. Brown, R. C. Mitchell, and A. J. Cawman Effects of Victims' Characteristics on Attitudes Toward Hate Crimes J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2006; 21(7): 890 - 909. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Haider-Markel Perception and Misperception in Urban Criminal Justice Policy: The Case of Hate Crime Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2004; 39(4): 491 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. R. Rayburn, M. Mendoza, and G. C. Davidson Bystanders' Perceptions of Perpetrators and Victims of Hate Crime: An Investigation Using the Person Perception Paradigm J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1055 - 1074. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. COGAN Hate Crime as a Crime Category Worthy of Policy Attention American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2002; 46(1): 173 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]