Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WERTH, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by DURHAM, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Cultural Diversity on End-of-life Care and Decisions

JAMES L. WERTH, Jr.

University of Akron

DEAN BLEVINS

University of Akron

KARINE L. TOUSSAINT

Suffolk University

MARTHA R. DURHAM

Auburn University

The heath care system in the United States is based on specific cultural beliefs that are sometimes inappropriate with groups that have different belief systems. These cultural differences can be seen in various end-of-life situations. To familiarize providers with some of the ways that culture can influence end-of-life care and decisions, the authors focus on the following three individual characteristics shown to be important in the literature: age, ethnicity, and gender. The article contains a broad overview of the (a) documented differences in the cultural interpretations of the ethical meta principles (e.g., autonomy and respect), (b) provision of medical service in general and pain management in particular to different groups, and (c) attitudes toward various end-of-life interventions and the use of advance directives. Finally, the authors summarize guidelines for making end-of-life care more culturally sensitive, which emphasize that each person must be interacted with as a unique individual.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 46, No. 2, 204-219 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/000276402236673


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Transcult NursHome page
M.-J. Johnstone and O. Kanitsaki
Ethics and Advance Care Planning in a Culturally Diverse Society
J Transcult Nurs, October 1, 2009; 20(4): 405 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
K. Jones
Diversities in approach to end-of-life: A view from Britain of the qualitative literature
Journal of Research in Nursing, July 1, 2005; 10(4): 431 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. L. WERTH Jr.
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Mental Health Professionals Related to End-of-life Care and Decision Making
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2002; 46(3): 373 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. L. WERTH Jr. and D. BLEVINS
Public Policy and End-of-life Care
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2002; 46(3): 401 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]