Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGMAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Introduction

Introduction

LAUREN LANGMAN

Loyola University of Chicago

With television, electoral politics has been transformed from competition between groups over interests to competitions between elites for audience share. How has electronic reproduction impacted the "aura" of politics in an "amusement society"? Douglas Kellner illustrates how media-produced images and spectacles of the presidency are similar to movies and soap operas. Chris Rojek argues that Nixon was the last president with a real aura, "post-auratic" presidents are shaped by media considerations. Lauren Langman shows how Zippergate was little more than an expensive soap opera whose audiences saw Bill and Monica as a hero and heroine assaulted by puritanical villains. For Terry Clark, given shifts in the "political culture" in which the majority is socially liberal and economically conservative, political leaders must have images that can embrace both positions, Bill Clinton as the model. Gary Fine and Emily Eisenberg ask why Nixon and Clinton evoke such powerful feelings and suggest the political images and values of earlier times shape later perceptions. Finally, Michael Weinstein and Deena Weinstein show how following 9/11, the country needed a strong resolute leader, and so the media transformed George Bush—overnight he went from a rather mediocre, "accidental" president to the strong leader fighting for democracy.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 46, No. 4, 445-466 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202238057


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?