Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melson, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Child Development and the Human-Companion Animal Bond

Gail F. Melson

Purdue University

Companion animals are more common in households with minor children than in any other household type. More than 70% of U.S. households with children also have pets, with most parents reporting acquisition of an animal "for the children." Yet, studies of children's development largely have been limited to children's relationships with other humans. This article argues for a biocentric approach to development, in which children's contacts with the non-human world—animals, plants, and natural ecologies—come under scientific scrutiny. To understand the developmental significance of this ubiquitous aspect of children's environments, theory and research on companion animals in relation to perceptual, cognitive, social, and emotional development are reviewed and evaluated. The significance of children's encounters with animals, especially in the context of a human-companion animal bond, is emphasized. Biocentric research directions are described.

Key Words: pets • companion animals • psychology • children

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 47, No. 1, 31-39 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764203255210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
T. B. Rampton, J. L. Rosemann, A. L. Latta, B. L. Mandleco, S. Olsen Roper, and T. T. Dyches
Images of Life: Siblings of Children With Down Syndrome
Journal of Family Nursing, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 420 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
S. Wehberg, W. Vach, D. Bleses, P. Thomsen, T. O. Madsen, and H. Basboll
Danish children's first words: Analysing longitudinal data based on monthly CDI parental reports
First Language, October 1, 2007; 27(4): 361 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]