This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Russell, P. A. Articles by Preston, F. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Airline Security After the Event

Unintended Consequences and Illusions

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Frederick W. Preston

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Interviews with airline and security employees and public information are used to examine the real and perceived outcomes of public policy reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11. The examination uses the classic functionalist perspective of Robert Merton and the more recent insights of Raymond Boudon. Attempts to reduce the threat of terrorist success and to foster confidence in the flying public had mixed results. Clearly governments and airlines were not well prepared for terrorist attacks, a fact that was well known to insiders but not widely known to the public. Many of the illusions of security that preceded the attacks were exposed by discussions and policy reactions following September 11.

Key Words: terrorism • unintended consequences • airline security • functionalism • perverse effects • TSA

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Salter Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 243 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]