This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gerber, A. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Does Campaign Spending Work?

Field Experiments Provide Evidence and Suggest New Theory

Yale University

This article reports the results of several field experiments designed to measure campaign effects in partisan contests. The findings suggest incumbent campaigns failed to increase incumbent vote share, whereas the challenger campaign was effective. To understand these and other results, the incumbent’s optimal spending strategy was analyzed theoretically. The analysis reveals that if incumbents maximize their probability of victory rather than vote share, campaigns by typical incumbents are expected to produce only minimal improvement in incumbent vote share. The analysis also explains how returns to campaign spending vary with the competitiveness of the election, how incumbent spending can improve the incumbent’s probability of victory yet have only minimal effect on incumbent vote share, and why rational spending plans might decrease the sponsor’s expected vote. This article demonstrates the wide scope of application for field experiments and provides an example of how experimental findings can serve as a catalyst for generating theories.

Key Words: field experiment • experiment • campaigns • campaign spending • campaign finance • elections

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 47, No. 5, 541-574 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764203260415


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. C. Vicente and L. Wantchekon Clientelism and vote buying: lessons from field experiments in African elections Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy, June 1, 2009; 25(2): 292 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Boatright, D. P. Green, and M. J. Malbin Does Publicizing a Tax Credit for Political Contributions Increase Its Use?: Results From a Randomized Field Experiment American Politics Research, September 1, 2006; 34(5): 563 - 582. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Cardy An Experimental Field Study of the GOTV and Persuasion Effects of Partisan Direct Mail and Phone Calls The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2005; 601(1): 28 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]