Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Losada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heaphy, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams

A Nonlinear Dynamics Model

Marcial Losada

Meta Learning

Emily Heaphy

University of Michigan Business School

Connectivity, the control parameter in a nonlinear dynamics model of team performance is mathematically linked to the ratio of positivity to negativity (P/N) in team interaction. By knowing the P/N ratio it is possible to run the nonlinear dynamics model that will portray what types of dynamics are possible for a team. These dynamics are of three types: point attractor, limit cycle, and complexor (complex order, or "chaotic" in the mathematical sense). Low performance teams end up in point attractor dynamics, medium perfomance teams in limit cycle dynamics, and high performance teams in complexor dynamics.

Key Words: positivity • connectivity • team performance • nonlinear dynamics

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 47, No. 6, 740-765 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764203260208
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
S. Onyett
Working Appreciatively to Improve Services for Children and Families
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, October 1, 2009; 14(4): 495 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
K. S. Cameron
Paradox in Positive Organizational Change
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2008; 44(1): 7 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
B. B. Caza and A. Caza
Positive Organizational Scholarship: A Critical Theory Perspective
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2008; 17(1): 21 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr Cancer TherHome page
I. R. Bell and M. Koithan
Models for the Study of Whole Systems
Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 293 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. E. Peelle III
Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving in Cross-Functional Teams
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2006; 42(4): 447 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
N. Marks and S. Thompson
Towards a flourishing society: economics, politics and well-being
Perspectives in Public Health, November 1, 2006; 126(6): 260 - 261.
[PDF]