This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jackson, B. Articles by Jamieson, K. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Finding Fact in Political Debate

FactCheck.org Annenberg Political Fact Check

Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania

Politicians seldom tell outright lies, but they often mislead voters intentionally with statements that use any of several techniques. These includeusing statistics that may be arithmetically correct but that give voters a false picture of reality, leaving out key facts and fudging about unstated assumptions, and so forth. The public should expect news reporters to catch these tricks, but too often the misleading statements are merely quoted along with a comment from the opposing candidate in the classic "he-said-she-said" style. Both reporters and voters need to be more aware of the ways in which politicians try to manipulate them. This article offers seven principles for sifting through misleading rhetoric to find the essential facts and gives examples from the 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns.

Key Words: fact • FactCheck.org (Annenberg PoliticalFactCheck) • voters • politicians • mislead

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 48, No. 2, 229-237 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764204267268


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?