This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Willyard, J. Articles by Ritter, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Election 2004 Concession and Victory Speeches

The Influence of Genre, Context, and Speaker on Addresses by Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates

Kurt Ritter

Texas A&M University

This analysis of the 2004 presidential election concession-victory ritual shows that generic norms had the greatest influence on the speeches, but presidential candidates John Kerry and George W. Bush occasionally violated generic expectations due to the context of their speeches and their personal inclinations. In particular, Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards disrupted the dynamics of the closing ritual of the election with a speech strikingly incongruent with Kerry's concession speech. This study concludes that a full understanding of the quadrennial concession-victory ritual requires attention to context and speakers as well as to genre. Because of the reciprocal nature of the ritual of acknowledging defeat and declaring victory, scholars also need to examine statements by the losing and winning vice presidential candidates.

Key Words: political communication • presidential rhetoric • victory speeches • concession speeches • campaign genres

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 49, No. 3, 488-509 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764205279439


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?