This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, D. R. Articles by Hanson, K. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Children, Media, and Methodology

University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Katherine G. Hanson

University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Media effect studies on children have focused on time spent with media relative to some outcome. We argue that researchers should examine quantity as the sole measure of media input only when it is of theoretical significance. In most circumstances media content and form are more important than time spent. A media diet metaphor is proposed as an alternative approach that includes both amount of exposure and program content across media platforms. Quantity is relevant primarily for hypotheses that concern time displacement (such as TV viewing displacing physical exercise) or other medium-general effects. In addition, technological advances have not yet been exploited that can allow new methodologies for studying media use and impact. As examples, eye tracking and magnetic resonance imaging are discussed to illustrate how new approaches can provide researchers with opportunities to ask different questions and to provide new perspectives on old questions.

Key Words: children • media • methodology • television viewing • eye tracking • fMRI

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 52, No. 8, 1204-1219 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764209331542


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?