Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudy, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Konefal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nature, Sociology, and Social Justice

Environmental Sociology, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum

Alan P. Rudy

Michigan State University

Jason Konefal

Michigan State University

Environmental sociology remains on the periphery of the discipline because its traditional moment focuses on the material rather than social world and its synthetic moment looks as much like geography, anthropology, science studies, and cultural studies as it does sociology. This article will review contemporary visions of the history of nature and the environmental movement and their consequences of environmental sociological pedagogy. In doing so, it will suggest using O'Connor's political ecological theory of environmental problems to teach the range of problems and approaches associated with the subdiscipline. Two strategies are stressed. The first combines social and environmental history in coursework, nonclass exercises, and writing. The second pursues undergraduate research into the social and ecological history of "natural" places, such as woods and parks, and "social" places, such as blocks of student rentals and campus buildings.

Key Words: environmental sociology • pedagogy • political ecology • science studies • cultural studies • student research

References

  • Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the universe halfway. In L. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 161-194). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
  • Benton, T. (1989). Marxism and natural limits. New Left Review, 178, 51-86.
  • Benton, T. (1991). Biology and social science. Sociology, 25, 1-29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bevington, D. (1998). Earth First! in Northern California: An interview with Judi Bari. In D. Faber (Ed.), The struggle for ecological democracy (pp. 248-271). New York: Guilford.
  • Bird, E.A.R. (1987). The social construction of nature. Environmental Review, 11, 255-264.
  • Brulle, R.J. (2000). Agency, democracy, and nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bryant, B., & Mohai, P. (1992). Race and the incidence of environmental hazards. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Bullard, R.D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Bullard, R.D. (1993). Confronting environmental racism. Boston: South End.
  • Buttel, F.H. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm? American Sociologist, 13, 252-256.[Web of Science]
  • Buttel, F.H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Castree, N., & Braun, B. (1998). The construction of nature and the nature of construction. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality (pp. 1-42). London: Routledge.
  • Catton, W.R., Jr., & Dunlap, R.E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.[Web of Science]
  • Collingwood, R.G. (1945). The idea of nature. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  • Cronon, W. (1983). Changes in the land. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Cronon, W. (1991). Nature's metropolis. New York: Norton.
  • Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Uncommon ground (pp. 69-90). New York: Norton.
  • Crosby, A.W. (1972). The Columbian exchange. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Crosby, A.W. (1986). Ecological imperialism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crosby, A.W. (1994). Germs, seeds and animals: Studies in ecological history. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Di Chiro, G. (1998). Environmental justice from the grassroots. In D. J. Faber (Ed.), The struggle for ecological democracy (pp. 104-136). New York: Guilford.
  • Dickens, P. (1992). Society and nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Dowie, M. (1997). Losing ground. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dunlap, R.E., & Catton, W.R. (1979). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243-273.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ehrlich, P.R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine.
  • Faber, D.J. (1993). Environment under fire. New York: Monthly Review.
  • Faber, D. J. (Ed.). (1998). The struggle for ecological democracy. New York: Guilford.
  • Field, R.C. (1995). Risk and justice: Capitalist production and the environment. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 8, 69-94.
  • FitzSimmons, M. (1989). The matter of nature. Antipode, 21, 106-120.[CrossRef]
  • FitzSimmons, M., & Gottlieb, R. (1986). A new environmental politics? Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning.
  • Foster, J.B. (1999). Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366-405.[CrossRef]
  • Foster, J.B. (2000). Marx's ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review.
  • Fox, S. ( 1985). The American conservation movement. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
  • Gaard, G. (2001). Women, water, energy: An ecofeminist approach. Organization & Environment, 14, 157-172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Glacken, C.J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian shore. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Goldman, M. (1997). "Customs in common": The epistemic world of the commons scholars. Theory and Society, 26, 1-37.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gottlieb, R. (1993). Forcing the spring. Washington, DC: Island.
  • Gottlieb, R. (2001). Environmentalism unbound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gould, K., Schnaiberg, A., & Weinberg, A.S. (1996). Local environmental struggles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gould, K.A., Roberts, J.T., & Lewis, T. (2004). Blue-green coalitions: Constraints and possibilities in the post 9-11 political environment. Journal of World-Systems Research, 10, 91-118.
  • Hamilton, J. (1995). Testing for environmental racism: prejudice, profits, political power? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14, 107-132.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Haraway, D.J. (1992). The promises of monsters. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York: Routledge.
  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1974). Population, resources and the ideology of science. Economic Geography, 50, 256-277.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hays, S.P. (1959). Conservation and the gospel of e ficiency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hecht, S.B., & Cockburn, A. (1990). The fate of the forest. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Hess, D.J. (1997). If you're thinking of living in STS. In G. Downey and J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels (pp. 143-164). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
  • Hofrichter, R. (1993). Toxic struggles. Philadelphia: New Society.
  • Hurley, A. (1995). Environmental inequalities. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41, 223-244.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kaelberer, M. (1993). The emergence of green parties in Western Europe. Comparative Politics, 25, 229-243.[CrossRef]
  • Knorr-Cetina, Karen. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Konefal, J. (2002, August). Societies, natures, and science in environmental problems: A case study of the Hudson River PCB conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Chicago.
  • Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Kuletz, V. (1998). The tainted desert. New York: Routledge.
  • Laird, F.N. (1993). Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision-making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18, 341-361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lappé, F.M., & Schurman, R. (1990). Taking population seriously. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Leff, E. (1993). Marxism and environmental question: From critical theory. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 4, 44-66.
  • Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Martinez-Alier, J., & Naredo, J.M. (1982). A Marxist precursor of energy economics: Podolinsky. Journal of Peasant Studies, 9, 207-234.[Web of Science]
  • Marx, K. (1987a). Collected works (Vol. 30). New York: International.
  • Marx, K. (1987b). Collected works (Vol. 31). New York: International.
  • Marx, K. (1990). Collected works (Vol. 32). New York: International.
  • Marx, K. (1993). Collected works: Vol. 35. Capital (Vol. I). New York: International.
  • Marx, K. (1996). Collected works: Vol. 36. Capital (Vol. II). New York: International.
  • Marx, K. (1998). Collected works: Vol. 37. Capital (Vol. III). New York: International.
  • McPhee, J. (1977). Encounters with the archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  • Meadows, D., & Meadows, D. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe.
  • Mellor, M. (1997). Feminism and ecology. New York: New York University Press.
  • Merchant, C. (1982). The death of nature. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Introduction. In Ecofeminism (pp. 1-21). London: Zed.
  • Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • O'Connor, J. (1973). Fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin's.
  • O'Connor, J. (1988). Capitalism nature socialism: A theoretical introduction. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1, 11-38.
  • O'Connor, J. (1989). Uneven and combined development and ecological crisis. Race and Class, 30, 1-11.
  • O'Connor, J. (1991). On the two contradictions of capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 2, 107-110.
  • O'Connor, J. (1998). The conditions of production and the production of conditions. In Natural causes (pp. 135-178). New York: Guilford.
  • Oelschlager, M. (1991). The idea of wilderness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Oelschlager, M. (1992). The wilderness condition. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
  • Pellow, D.N. (2002). Garbage wars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pepper, D. (1996). Modern environmentalism. London: Routledge.
  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.
  • Rosa, E.A. (1998). Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 15-44.[CrossRef]
  • Sage, C. (1994). Population, consumption and sustainable development. In M. Redclift & C. Sage (Eds.), Strategies for sustainable development (pp. 35-59). New York: John Wiley.
  • Salleh, A. (1993). Class, race, and gender discourse in the ecofeminism—deep ecology debate. Environmental Ethics, 15, 225-244.[Web of Science]
  • Sandler, B. (1994). Grow or die: Marxist theories of capitalism and the environment. Rethinking Marxism, 7, 38-57.
  • Scarce, R. (1990). Eco-warriors. Chicago: Noble.
  • Scarce, R., & Mascarenhas, M. (2003). Environmental sociology: Syllabi and instructional materials (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Scarce, R., & Smith, D. (1999). Environmental sociology: Syllabi and instructional material (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, G. ( 1998). Women, poverty, and population. In K. Conca & G. Dabelko (Eds.), Green planet blues (pp. 290-311). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Shantz, J. (2002). Judi Bari and "the feminization of Earth First!": The convergence of class, gender and radical environmentalism. Feminist Review, 70, 105-122.
  • Short, J.F. (1999). Characterizing and managing environmental and technological risks. In W. Freudenberg & T. I. K. Youn (Eds.), Research in social problems and public policy (Vol. 7, pp. 325-355). Stamford, CT: JAI.
  • Smith, N. (1989). Uneven development and location theory. In R. Peet (Ed.), New models in geography (pp. 142-163). London: Unwin-Hyman.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Power, nature, and the city. Environment and Planning A, 29, 311-332.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Szasz, A. (1991). In praise of policy Luddism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 2, 17-43.
  • Szasz, A. (1994). EcoPopulism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Szasz, A., & Meuser, M. (1997). Public participation in the cleanup of contaminated military facilities. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 34, 211-233.
  • Taylor, A.M. (1979). Dialectics of nature or dialectics of practice? Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 289-308.
  • Taylor, D.E. (1997). American environmentalism: The role of race, class and gender, 1820-1995. Race, Gender and Class, 5, 16-62.
  • Taylor, D.E. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 508-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Taylor, P.J. (1997). How do we know we have global environmental problems? In P. Taylor, S. Halfon, & P. Edwards (Eds.), Changing life (pp. 149-174). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world. New York: Pantheon.
  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • United Church of Christ Commission on Racial Justice. (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States. New York: United Church of Christ.
  • United States General Accounting Office. ( 1995). Hazardous and non-hazardous waste: demographics of people living near waste facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Warren, K., & Erkal, N. (1997). Ecofeminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Watts, M. (1998). Nature as artifice and artifact. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality (pp. xiv, 295). London: Routledge.
  • Westra, L., & Wenz, P.S. (1995). Faces of environmental racism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of nature. In Problems in materialism and culture (pp. 67-85). London: Verso.
  • Winston, M.L. (1997). Nature wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Worster, D. (1977). Nature's economy. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
  • Worster, D. (1985). Rivers of empire. New York: Pantheon.
  • Worster, D. (1990). The ecology of order and chaos. Environmental History Review, 14, 1-18.
  • Worster, D. (1994a). Nature and the disorder of history. Environmental History Review, 18, 1-16.
  • Worster, D. (1994b). Nature's economy: A history of ecological ideas (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wynne, B. (2002). Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology. Current Sociology, 50, 459-477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • York, R., Rosa, E.A., & Dietz, T. (2003a). Footprints on the earth. American Sociological Review, 68, 279-300.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • York, R., Rosa, E.A., & Dietz, T. (2003b). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT. Ecological Economics, 46, 351-365.
  • Young, R.M. (1985). Is nature a labour process? In L. Levidow & R. M. Young (Eds.), Science, technology and the labour process (Vol. 2, pp. 206-232). London: Free Association.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 51, No. 4, 495-515 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764207307739


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudy, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Konefal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?