Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Behavioral Scientist
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferber, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Matrix of Oppression and Privilege

Theory and Practice for the New Millennium

Abby L. Ferber

Matrix Center for the Advancement of Social Equity and Inclusion University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Andrea O'Reilly Herrera

Matrix Center for the Advancement of Social Equity and Inclusion University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Dena R. Samuels

Matrix Center for the Advancement of Social Equity and Inclusion University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

This article discusses a creative, collaborative model the authors have developed between the Ethnic Studies and Women's Studies programs on their campus that provides a paradigm that other universities around the country might learn from. After situating the program within a historical and national context, this article examines the specific challenges faced within the university setting and offers a range of institutional strategies that have proven successful. The authors examine their collaboration, which consciously mirrors and attempts to implement the growing movement in teaching and research toward an intersectional approach to teaching about privilege and oppression. Within the university context, this framework has been institutionalized within the curriculum as well as the structure of the program. In the new millennium, this framework can serve as a model for other campuses.

Key Words: race • curriculum • oppression • privilege • ethnic studies • women's studies

References

  • Andolsen, B.H. (1986). "Daughters of Je ferson, daughters of bootblacks": Racism and American feminism. Macon GA: Mercer University Press.
  • Baca Zinn, M., Cannon, L.W., Higginbotham, E., & Dill, B.T. (1986). The costs of exclusionary practices in women's studies. Signs, 11(2), 290-303.[CrossRef]
  • Bohmer, S., & Briggs, J. (1991). Teaching privileged students about gender, race and class oppression. Teaching Sociology, 19(2), 154-163.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Boxer, Marilyn J. (1982). For and about women: The theory and practice of women's studies in the United States. Signs, 7(3), 661-695.[CrossRef]
  • Coppock, V., Haydon, D., & Richter, I. (1995). The illusions of "post-feminism." London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Ferber, A.L. (2003). Defending the culture of privilege. In M. S. Kimmel & A. L. Ferber (Eds.), Privilege: A reader (pp. 319-330). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Ferber, A.L., & Storrs, D. (1995). Race and representation: Students of color in the multicultural classroom. In B. Goebel & J. Hall (Eds.), Teaching a "new canon"? Students, teachers and texts in the college literature classroom (pp. 32-47). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Freedman, E.B. (2002). No turning back: The history of feminism and the future of women. New York: Ballantine.
  • Hammer, R. (2002). Antifeminism and family terrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margins to center. Boston: South End.
  • Hull, G.T., Scott, P.B., & Smith, B. (1982). All the women are White, all the Blacks are men, but some of us are brave. New York: Feminist.
  • Johnson, A.G. (2001). Privilege, power and di ference. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Katz, J.N. (2007). The invention of heterosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kimmel, M. S., & Ferber, A. L. (Eds.). (2003). Privilege: A reader. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Lesage, J., Ferber, A.L., Storrs, D., & Wong, D. (2002). Making a di ference: University students of color speak out. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • McPhail, M.L. (2002). The rhetoric of racism revisited: Reparations or separation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege (Working Paper 189). Wellesley College, Center for Research on Women, Wellesley, MA.
  • Minh-ha, T.T. (1989). Woman, native, other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Mohanty, C.T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991). Third World women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Moraga, C., & Anzaldua, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table.
  • Paglia, C. (1994). Vamps and tramps: New essays. New York: Vintage.
  • Rogers, M.F., & Garrett, C.D. (2002). Who's afraid of women's studies? Feminism in everyday life. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
  • Samuels, D.R. (2003). What's in your student's "invisible knapsack"? Facilitating their connection with oppression and privilege. In B. Scott, J. Misra, & M. Segal (Eds.), Race, gender, and class in sociology: Toward an inclusive curriculum (pp. 5-14). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
  • Samuels, D.R., Ferber, A.L., & O'Reilly Herrera, A. (2003). Introducing the concepts of oppression and privilege into the classroom [Special issue]. Race, Gender, and Class, 10(4).
  • Sommers, C.H. (1994). Who stole feminism? How women have betrayed women. New York: Touchstone.
  • Tatum, B.D. (2000). The ABC approach to creating climates of engagement on diverse campuses. Liberal Education, 86(4), pp. 22-29.
  • Valverde, L. A., & Castenell, L. A. (Eds.). (1998). The multicultural campus: Strategies for transforming higher education. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.

American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 51, No. 4, 516-531 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764207307740


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferber, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?