|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Mass Shootings in SchoolsThe Worst Possible Case for Gun Control
Gary Kleck
Florida State University, Tallahassee
The most frequent policy lesson drawn following the Columbine school shootings was the need for more gun controls. Review of the details of both Columbine and other contemporary school shootings indicates, however, that the specific gun control measures proposed in their aftermath were largely irrelevant and almost certainly could not have prevented the incidents or reduced their death tolls. These measures included restrictions on gun shows, child access prevention laws mandating locking up guns, and bans on assault weapons. Ironically, exploitation of school shootings for the advocacy of irrelevant gun controls may have obscured the genuine merits of various gun control measures for reducing "ordinary" gun violence. Thus, mass school shootings provided the worst possible basis for supporting gun control.
Key Words: gun control • mass shootings • school violence
References
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. (2008 a). [Legislative initiatives]. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://www.bradycampaign.org/lesislation
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. (2008 b). Major U.S. school shootings. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/pdf/school-shootings.pdf
- Duwe, G. (2007). Mass murder in the United States: A history. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
- Hepburn, L., Azrael, D., Miller, M., & Hemenway, D. (2006). The effect of child access prevention laws on unintentional child firearm fatalities, 1979-2000. Journal of Trauma, 61, 423-428.[CrossRef]
- Ikeda, R.M., Dahlberg, L.L., Sacks, J.J., Mercy, J.A., & Powell, K. (1997). Estimating intruder-related firearm retrievals in U.S. households, 1994. Violence and Victims, 12, 363-372.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kleck, G. (1988). Crime control through the private use of armed force. Social Problems, 35, 1-21.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting guns. New York: Aldine.
- Kleck, G. (1999). There are no lessons to be learned from Littleton. Criminal Justice Ethics, 18, 61-63.
- Kleck, G. (2001a). Absolutist politics in a moderate package: Prohibitionist intentions of the gun control movement. In G. Kleck & D. B. Kates (Eds.), Armed: New perspectives on gun control (pp. 129-172). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
- Kleck, G. (2001b). Can owning a gun really triple the owner's chances of being murdered? Homicide Studies, 5, 64-77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kleck, G. (2001c). The frequency of defensive gun use: Evidence and disinformation. In G. Kleck & D. B. Kates (Eds.), Armed: New perspectives on gun control (pp. 213-283). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
- Kleck, G., & DeLone, M. (1993). Victim resistance and offender weapon effects in robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 55-82.
- Kleck, G., & Gertz, M. (1995). Armed resistance to crime: The prevalence and nature of self-defense with a gun. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 150-187.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Kleck, G., & Wang, S. (in press). The myth of big-time gun trafficking and the overinterpretation of gun tracing data. UCLA Law Review.
- Lawrence, R.G., & Birkland, T.A. (2004). Guns, Hollywood, and school safety. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1193-1207.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- May, D.C., & Jarjura, G.R. (2006). Illegal guns in the wrong hands. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
- Muschert, G.W., & Larkin, R.W. (2007). The Columbine High School shootings. In S. Chermak & F. Y. Bailey (Eds.), Crimes and trials of the century (Vol. 2, pp. 253-266). Westport, CT: Praeger.
- National Safety Council. (2007). Injury facts (2007ed.). Itasca, IL: National Safety Council.
- Newman, K.S. (2004). Rampage: The social roots of school shootings. New York: Basic Books.
- Sheley, J., & Wright, J.D. (1995). In the line of fire. New York: Aldine.
- Tark, J., & Kleck, G. (2004). Resisting crime: The effects of victim action on the outcomes of crimes. Criminology, 42, 861-909.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. ( 2000). Following the gun: Enforcing federal laws against firearms traffickers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
- U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. ( 2005). Federal firearms regulations reference guide 2005 (ATF Publication 5300.4). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Firearm use by offenders (BJS Special Report). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Violence Policy Center. (2000). " Unsafe in any hands: why America needs to ban handguns." Retrieved February 16, 2009, from http://www.vpc.org/studies/unsafe.htm
- Violence Policy Center. (2000). " About the Violence Policy Center." Retrieved February 16, 2009, from http://www.vpc.org/aboutvpc.htm.
- Webster, D.W., & Starnes, M. (2000). Reexamining the association between child access prevention gun laws and unintentional shooting death of children. Pediatrics, 106, 1466-1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wright, J.D., & Rossi, P.H. (1986). Armed and considered dangerous. New York: Aldine.
This version was published on June
1, 2009
American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 52, No. 10,
1447-1464 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0002764209332557
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
